This website requires JavaScript.
Explore
Help
Sign In
schihei
/
arxiv-sanity-lite
Watch
1
Star
0
Fork
0
You've already forked arxiv-sanity-lite
Code
Issues
Pull Requests
Actions
Packages
Projects
Releases
Wiki
Activity
Files
68e4e0f3bd3e9662d9663fe13b377ea065254dea
arxiv-sanity-lite
/
static
T
History
Ajdin Trejic
7a438d9c46
Made site a bit more mobile friendly
2021-12-18 23:30:40 +01:00
..
favicon.png
first leet codes
2021-11-12 20:40:19 -08:00
paper_detail.js
kind of big changes here: we can now inspect & see the most positive and negative words for a trained svm, to help tune the value C. then there is also the UI for setting value C in the SVM. Finally the value of C I adjusted to default to 0.01 (was 0.1 before) because the results and the weights look more sensible based on manual inspection. We need some dataset of people libraries in order to potentially cross-validate a good value C automatically. For now there are not enough active users of the site that such a thing could be attempted and succeed. Doing my best now just by eyeballing
2021-12-08 00:17:37 -08:00
paper_list.js
kind of big changes here: we can now inspect & see the most positive and negative words for a trained svm, to help tune the value C. then there is also the UI for setting value C in the SVM. Finally the value of C I adjusted to default to 0.01 (was 0.1 before) because the results and the weights look more sensible based on manual inspection. We need some dataset of people libraries in order to potentially cross-validate a good value C automatically. For now there are not enough active users of the site that such a thing could be attempted and succeed. Doing my best now just by eyeballing
2021-12-08 00:17:37 -08:00
search.png
first leet codes
2021-11-12 20:40:19 -08:00
style.css
Made site a bit more mobile friendly
2021-12-18 23:30:40 +01:00
word_list.js
kind of big changes here: we can now inspect & see the most positive and negative words for a trained svm, to help tune the value C. then there is also the UI for setting value C in the SVM. Finally the value of C I adjusted to default to 0.01 (was 0.1 before) because the results and the weights look more sensible based on manual inspection. We need some dataset of people libraries in order to potentially cross-validate a good value C automatically. For now there are not enough active users of the site that such a thing could be attempted and succeed. Doing my best now just by eyeballing
2021-12-08 00:17:37 -08:00