Andrej Karpathy c3cb157c9f first version of pagination w00t w00t! it's a bit hacky i think, should be possible to improve this code and make it smaller and cleaner and etc.

2021-12-18 21:14:44 -08:00

..

favicon.png

first leet codes

2021-11-12 20:40:19 -08:00

paper_detail.js

kind of big changes here: we can now inspect & see the most positive and negative words for a trained svm, to help tune the value C. then there is also the UI for setting value C in the SVM. Finally the value of C I adjusted to default to 0.01 (was 0.1 before) because the results and the weights look more sensible based on manual inspection. We need some dataset of people libraries in order to potentially cross-validate a good value C automatically. For now there are not enough active users of the site that such a thing could be attempted and succeed. Doing my best now just by eyeballing

2021-12-08 00:17:37 -08:00

paper_list.js

kind of big changes here: we can now inspect & see the most positive and negative words for a trained svm, to help tune the value C. then there is also the UI for setting value C in the SVM. Finally the value of C I adjusted to default to 0.01 (was 0.1 before) because the results and the weights look more sensible based on manual inspection. We need some dataset of people libraries in order to potentially cross-validate a good value C automatically. For now there are not enough active users of the site that such a thing could be attempted and succeed. Doing my best now just by eyeballing

2021-12-08 00:17:37 -08:00

search.png

first leet codes

2021-11-12 20:40:19 -08:00

style.css

first version of pagination w00t w00t! it's a bit hacky i think, should be possible to improve this code and make it smaller and cleaner and etc.

2021-12-18 21:14:44 -08:00

word_list.js

kind of big changes here: we can now inspect & see the most positive and negative words for a trained svm, to help tune the value C. then there is also the UI for setting value C in the SVM. Finally the value of C I adjusted to default to 0.01 (was 0.1 before) because the results and the weights look more sensible based on manual inspection. We need some dataset of people libraries in order to potentially cross-validate a good value C automatically. For now there are not enough active users of the site that such a thing could be attempted and succeed. Doing my best now just by eyeballing

2021-12-08 00:17:37 -08:00